The shear bond measurement of two self-adhesive composite resins to both enamel and dentin (An in vitro study)

  • Abdulkareem Ramadhan Ibrahim Department of Conservative and Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Duhok, Duhok, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
Keywords: Shear bond strength, Self-adhesive, Vertise Flow, Constic

Abstract

Background and objectives: The aim of this study is to measure the shear bond strength of two self-adhesive composite resins (Vertise Flow, Kerr and Constic, DMG) to both enamel and dentin and compared it to that of conventional flowable composite (used with self-etching bonding system).
Methods: Sixty freshly extracted human third molar teeth were chosen for this study (thirty for enamel samples and thirty for dentin samples). The teeth were mounted horizontally, in blocks of self-cured acrylic resin to leave only buccal surfaces exposed. Then 0.5 and 2mm were cut from the buccal surface to obtain flat enamel and dentin surfaces successively. Thirty enamel samples were divided into three groups; group E1: Vertise Flow, group E2: Constic and group E3: conventional composite with self-etching bonding. Also the thirty dentin groups were divided into three groups, group D1, D2 and D3 with the same corresponding composites as in enamel groups. For all the specimens composite cylinders (4mm height and 4 mm in diameter) were built of the flat surface of the sample then subjected to shear bond testing in a universal testing machine.
Results: Group E3 (conventional flowable composite bonded to enamel) had the highest bond strength while group D1 ( Vertise Flow bonded to dentin) had the lowest bond.
Conclusion: Both self-adhesive composites provided insufficient shear bond strength less than that required for using in most clinical conditions.
Keywords: Shear bond strength, self-adhesive, Vertise Flow, Constic.

References

Christensen GJ. Amalgam vs. composite resin. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129:1757-9

Garcia RN, Morelli AE, da Silva BS. Bonding performance of a self-adhering flowable composite to substrates used in direct technique. Rev Bras Odontol 2013; 10:343-9.

Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2012; 27:17-28.

AlHumaid J, Al Harbi FA, ElEmbab AE. Performance of Self-adhering Flowable Composite in Class V Restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018; 19 (7):785-791

Milia E, Cumbo E, Cardoso RJ and Gallina G. Current Dental Adhesives Systems. A Narrative Review. Curr Pharm Design J 2012; 18: 5542-52.

Özcan S, Yıkılgan I, Bala O, Üçtaşlı MB, Ömürlü U. The Effect of Different Liners on the Microleakege of

Class II Restorations after Thermocycling and Occlusal Loading. Marmara Dent J 2013; 2: 71-5.

Yesilyurt C, Ceyhanli KT, Alp CK, Yildirim T, Tasdemir T. In vitro bonding effectiveness of new self-adhering flowable composite to calcium silicate-based material. Dent Mater J 2014; 33: 1-6

Erdemir U, Sancakli HS, Sancakli E. Shear bond strength of a new self-adhering flowable composite

resin for lithium disilicate reinforced CAD/CAM ceramic material. J Adv Prosthodont 2014; 6:434-43.

Parhami P, Pourhashemi SJ, Ghandehari M. Comparative Study of the Shear Bond Strength of Flowable Composite in Permanent Teeth Treated with Conventional Bur and Contact or Non-Contact Er:YAG Laser. Laser Med Sci 2014; 5:140-5.

Lopes GC, Marson FC, Vieira LCC. Composite Bond Strength to Enamel with Self-etching Primers. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 424-9.

Juloski J, Goracci C, Rengo C. Enamel and dentin bond strength of new simplified adhesive materials

with and without preliminary phosphoric acid etching. Am J Dent 2012;25: 239-43.

De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an autoadhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 963-71

Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28:215-35.

Kumari RV, Sinddaraju K, Nagarai H, Polur RK. Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Newer Bonding Systems on Superficial and Deep Dentin. J Int Oral Health 2015; 7: 31-35.

Perdigão J. Dentin bonding-variables related to the clinical situation and the substrate treatment. Dent Mater 2010; 26: e24-37.

Matos AB, Trevelin LT, Silva BTF, Francisconi-dos-Rios LF, Siriani LK, Cardoso MV. Bonding efficiency and durability: current possibilities. Braz. Oral Res 2017; 31: 3-22.

Tuloglu N, Tunc ES, Ozer S, Bayrak S. Shear bond strength of self-adhering flowable composite on dentin with and without application of an adhesive system. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2014; 12: 97-101.

Abdelrahman MH, Mahmoud EM, Ghoneim MM, Kammar AA. Comparative study of microleakage and

shear bond strength between bulk fill and self adhesive flowable composite resins. Alexandria Dent J 2016; 41:322-327.

Rangappa A, Srinivasulu J, Rangaswamy V,Eregowda S, Lakshminarasimhaiah V, Lingareddy U. Comparative evaluation of bond strength of self-adhering flowable composites to the dentin prepared with different burs: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2018; 21:618-21.

Rubens NG, Andrey EM, Beatriz SS, Bruna MG, Camila PP, Gabriela SL. Bonding performance of a self‑adhering flowable composite to substrates used in direct technique. Rev Sul Bras Odonto 2013l;

:343‑9.

İşman E, Karaarslan ES, Okşayan R, Tunçdemır AR, Üşümez S, Adanir N. Inadequate shear bond

strengths of self‑etch, self‑adhesive systems for secure orthodontic bonding. Dent Mater J 2012;

:947‑53.

Yuan H, Li M, Guo B, Gao Y, Liu H, Li J. Evaluation of microtensile bond strength and microleakage of a

self‑adhering flowable composite. J Adhes Dent 2015; 17:535‑43

Aurwade V , Gundappa M, Rani A, Agarwal A. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of

a self adhering Flowable composite to dentin of permanent teeth With different flowable composites used with self-etch Bonding agents: an ex-vivo pilot study. TMU J Dent 2018; 5: 5-7

Veli I, Akin M, Kucukyilmaz E, Uysal T. Shear bond strength of a self-adhering flowable composite when used for lingual retainer bonding. J Orofac Orthop 2014; 75: 374-83.

Fu J, Kakuda S, Pan F, Hoshika S, Ting S, Fukuoka A. Bonding performance of a newly developed step-less all-in-one system on dentin. Dent Mater J 2013; 32: 203-11.

Poitevin A, De Munck J, Van Ende A, Suyama Y, Mine A, Peumans M. Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive composites to dentin and enamel. Dent Mater 2013;29: 221-30.

Wang T, Nikaido T, Nakabayashi N. Photocure bonding agent containing phosphoric methacrylate.

Dent Mater 1991; 7: 59-62.

Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Mine A, Cardoso MV, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B. Filler debonding

& subhybrid-layer failures in self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res; 2010; 89:1045-50.

Published
2021-07-30
How to Cite
Ibrahim, A. (2021). The shear bond measurement of two self-adhesive composite resins to both enamel and dentin (An in vitro study). Erbil Dental Journal (EDJ), 4(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.15218/edj.2021.01
Section
Original Articles