Vertical marginal gap evaluation of PEEK and Zirconia crowns using extra-oral scanner and CAD/CAM systems (An Invitro study).


  • Raz Ali Aula Ministry of Health in Kurdistan Government, Erbil, Iraq.
  • Jawad Mohammed Mikaeel Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University.



PEEK, Zirconia, Crown, Marginal adaptation, Vertical marginal gap


Background and objective: Selecting a material with lower marginal gap is the key factor for a successful dental prosthesis. With less marginal gap of the crown the aggregation of bacterial plaque at the gingival margins, that result in periodontal diseases and secondary caries could be limited.
Methods: A mandibular right first molar of a sound tooth was prepared for the reference model according to the tooth preparations guideline with a heavy chamfer finishing line for full zirconia and Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) coverage. Digital impression technique with extraoral scanner was used for scanning and taking impression of the reference model, ten crowns in each group were designed and milled using CAD/CAM systems. The vertical marginal gap between the crown's margin and the finishing line was measured for each crown on the reference model with the aid of a stereomicroscope in 160x.
Results: The average (mean) for the marginal gap of proximal, buccal and lingual surfaces of both PEEK, and zirconia materials were: 409.097 μm, 112.869 μm, 198.563 μm, for PEEK and, 105.085 μm, 27.659 μm, 45.135 μm for zirconia respectively. Statistical analysis using t-test for two independent samples revealed that PEEK material showed a significantly higher marginal gap than z. irconia material.
Conclusion: PEEK crowns had a higher marginal gap than clinically acceptable limit, while zirconia crowns exhibited much lower measurements.


Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62(4):405–8.

Alfadda S. Vertical Marginal Gap Evaluation of Conventional Cast and Computer Numeric Controlled–Milled Titanium Full-Arch ImplantSupported Frameworks. J Prosthodont. 2014;27(6):517–22.

Wassell RW, Walls G, Steele JG. Crowns and extra-coronal restorations: Materials selection. BDJ. 2002;192(4):199–211.

Kokubo Y, Ohkubo C, Tsumita M, Miyashita A, Vult von steyern P, Fukushims S. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of Procera AllCeram crowns. Oral Rehabil. 2005;32(7):526–30.

Nakamura T, Tanaka H, Kinuta S, Akao T, Okamoto K, Wakabyashi K, Yatani H. In Vitro Study on Marginal and Internal Fit of CAD/CAM All-ceramic Crowns. Dent Mater J. 2005;24(3):456–9.

Fransson B, Oilo G, Gjeitanger R. The fit of metalceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater. 19851;5:197–9.

McLean JW, Von F. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J. 1971;131(3):107–11. sj.bdj.4802708.0.1038/sj.bdj.4802708

Parmar S. An In–Vitro Comparative Study on the Marginal Adaptation of Metal Ceramic Crowns and Zirconium Dioxide Crowns with Rounded Shoulder Finish Line Preparation. IOSRJDMS. 2020;19(6):13–7.

Ender A, Zimmermann M, Attin T, Mehl A. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;20(7):1495–1504.

Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digitaland conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(3):555–60.

Sulaya K, Guttal SS. Clinical evaluation of performance of single unit polyetheretherketone crown restoration-a pilot study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020;20:38–44.

Zarone F, Russo S, Sorrentino R. From porcelainfused-to-metal to zirconia: Clinical andexperimentalconsiderations. Dent Mater. 2011;27:83–96.

Attia MA, Shokry TE. Effect of different fabrication techniques on the marginal precision of polyetheretherketone single-crown copings. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124(5):565.e1–e7.

Hahnel S, Scherl C, Rosentritt M. Interim rehabilitation of occlusal vertical dimension using a double-crown-retained removable dental prosthesis with polyetheretherketone framework. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119:315–8.

Baig MR, Tan KBC, Nicholls JI. Evaluation of the marginal fit of a zirconia ceramic computer-aided machined (CAM) crown system. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;104(4):216–27.

Euan R, Figueras-Alvarez O, Cabratosa-Termes J, Brufau-de Barbera M, Gomes-Azevedo S. Comparison of the Marginal Adaptation of Zirconium Dioxide Crowns in Preparations with Two Different Finish Lines. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2012;21(4):291–295.

Rayyan M. Marginal Adaptation of Monolithic High-Translucency Versus Porcelain-Veneered Zirconia Crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 2019;32(4):364–6.

Hamza TA, Ezzat HA, El-Hossary MMK, El Megid Katamish HA, Shokry TE, Rosenstiel SF. Accuracy of ceramic restorations made with two CAD/ CAM systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109(2):83–7.

Romeo E, Iorio M, Storelli S, Camandona M, Abati S. Marginal adaptation of full-coverage CAD/CAM restorations: in vitro study using a non-destructive method. Minerva Stomatol. 2009;58(3):61–72.

Harish V, Ali SAM, Jagadesan N. Evaluation of internal and marginal fit of two metal ceramic system – in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(12):ZC53–6.

Buso L, Higert E, Neisser MP. Marginal fit of electroformed copings before and after the coction of the porcelain. Braz J Oral Sci. 2004;3(8):409–13.

Gassino G, Barone Monfrin S, Scanu M, Spina G, Preti G. Marginal adaptation of fixed prosthodontics: a new in vitro 360-degree external examination procedure. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17(2):218–23.

Nawafleh NA, Mack F, Evans J, Mackay J, Hatamleh MM. Accuracy and Reliability of Metods to Measure Marginal Adaptation of Crowns and FDPs: A Literature Review. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2013;22:419–28.

Rodiger M, Schneider L, Rinke S. Influence of material selection on the marginal accuracy of CAD/CAM fabricated metal- and all-ceramic single crown copings. Article ID 2143906. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:1–8

Meshreky M, Halim C, Katamish H. Vertical Marginal Gap Distance of CAD/CAM Milled BioHPP PEEK Coping Veneered by HIPC Compared to Zirconia Coping Veneered by CAD-On lithium disilicate “In-Vitro Study”. Advanced Dental Journal. 2020;2(2):43–50. https://10.21608/adjc.2020.21032.1043

Roy MS, Tewary S, Sanyal P, et al. An in vivo study to compare the marginal fit accuracy of crowns prepared using two different materials. J. Evolution Med. Dent. Sci. 2019;8(24):1930–4. https://10.14260/jemds/2019/424

Byrne G. Influence of finish-line form on crown cementation. Int J Prosthodont. 1992;5:137–144.

Hossam M, Elshahawy W, Masoud GE. Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation and Fracture Resistance of Bio HPP and Zirconia. EDJ. 2018; 64:1489–501.

Park JY, Bae S-Y, Lee JJ, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Evaluation of the marginal and internal gaps of three different dental prostheses: comparison of the silicone replica technique and threedimensional superimposition analysis. Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics. 2017;9(3):159–69.

K. Amin B. Comparative Study of Marginal Gap Among Zirconium Dioxide, Poly Ethyl Ethyl Ketone and Porcelain Fused to Metal Implant Supported Crowns. Sulaimani Dent J. 2019;6(1):29–32.

Zeighami S, Ghodsi S, Sahebi M, Yazarloo S. Comparison of Marginal Adaptation of Different Implant Supported Metal-Free Frameworks Before and After Cementation. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2019;32(4):361–3.

Jin H, Teng M, Wang Z, Li X, Liang J, Wang W. Comparative evaluation of Bio-HPP and titanium as a framework veneered with composite resin for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2019;122(4):383–8. https://10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.03.003.




How to Cite

Aula RA, Mikaeel JM. Vertical marginal gap evaluation of PEEK and Zirconia crowns using extra-oral scanner and CAD/CAM systems (An Invitro study). EDJ [Internet]. 2022 Jul. 30 [cited 2022 Aug. 10];5(1):37-43. Available from:



Original Articles