Evaluating the accuracy (precision and trueness) of conventional and digital Intraoral Impression Technique.

Authors

  • Lana Shwan Jalal Department of Department of Basic Science, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.
  • Dara Hamarashid Saeed Department of Conservative, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15218/edj.2023.06

Keywords:

Precision, trueness, accuracy, impression, intraoral scanner

Abstract

Background and Objectives: This study aims to compare and evaluate the accuracy of the conventional and digital intraoral scanner impression approaches of the maxillary edentulous arch with indirect fixed restorations.

Methods: Three prepared teeth were used in a reference model created for an inlay and a 3-unit bridge. From conventional impressions, models of stone were created. An intraoral scanner was utilized to produce digital impressions of the reference model (digital models), and then the stone models were scanned with a laboratory scanner. The stereolithography file format was used to export the files. To determine the trueness of preparations and the accuracy of a complete arch, by using 3D analysis software, all datasets were superimposed. To compare the two-model group's accuracy and assess the trueness of the two preparation methods, a test of Mann-Whitney U was utilized.

Results: Significant intergroup precision differences between the two groups (digital and stone) were seen for the complete arch, while the (p) value is smaller than 0.001. Nevertheless, in terms of trueness, there was a significant difference between the models and stone, while the (p) value is smaller than 0.001. Mann-Whitney U test revealed significant differences in trueness among the model groups (stone and digital) (p <.001) and types of preparation (p < .001).

Conclusions: Compared to stone models, digital models' root means square values of the accuracy of the full arch and its trueness of preparations were lower.  Nevertheless, compared to digital models, the trueness of the preparations and the complete arch's accuracy of stone models were inferior.

References

Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Feb;109(2):121–8.

Alghazzawi TF. Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: Options for practical implementation. J Prosthodont Res. 2016 Apr;60(2):72–84.

Runkel C, Güth JF, Erdelt K, Keul C. Digital impressions in dentistry-accuracy of impression digitalization by desktop scanners. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Mar;24(3):1249–57.

Basapogu S, Pilla A, Pathipaka S. Dimensional Accuracy of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic VPS Impression Materials Using Different Impression Techniques - An Invitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Feb;10(2):ZC56-59.

Schaefer O, Schmidt M, Goebel R, Kuepper H. Qualitative and quantitative three-dimensional accuracy of a single tooth captured by elastomeric impression materials: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Sep;108(3):165–72.

Kulkarni PR, Kulkarni RS, Shah RJ, Chhajlani R, Saklecha B, Maru K. A Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of the Dies Affected by Tray Type, Material Viscosity, and Pouring Sequence of Dual and Single Arch Impressions- An In vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Apr;11(4):ZC128–35.

B N, B K. Dimensional Stability and Acuracy of Silicone - Based Impression Materials Using Different Impression Techniques - A Literature Review. Prilozi (Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite Oddelenie za medicinski nauki) [Internet]. 2017 Sep 1 [cited 2021 Dec 10];38(2). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28991761/

Keul C, Stawarczyk B, Erdelt KJ, Beuer F, Edelhoff D, Güth JF. Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization--a laboratory study. Dent Mater. 2014 Apr;30(4):400–7.

Ender A, Zimmermann M, Attin T, Mehl A. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions. Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Sep;20(7):1495–504.

Güth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 May;17(4):1201–8.

Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Mar;115(3):313–20.

Muallah J, Wesemann C, Nowak R, Robben J, Mah J, Pospiech P, et al. accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral and extraoral scanners: an in vitro study using a new method of evaluation. Int J Comput Dent. 2017 Jan 1;20(2):151–64.

Mennito AS, Evans ZP, Nash J, Bocklet C, Lauer Kelly A, Bacro T, et al. Evaluation of the trueness and precision of complete arch digital impressions on a human maxilla using seven different intraoral digital impression systems and a laboratory scanner. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 Jul;31(4):369–77.

Sim JY, Jang Y, Kim WC, Kim HY, Lee DH, Kim JH. Comparing the accuracy (trueness and precision) of models of fixed dental prostheses fabricated by digital and conventional workflows. J Prosthodont Res. 2019 Jan;63(1):25–30.

Ender A, Mehl A. In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions. Quintessence Int. 2015 Jan;46(1):9–17.

Fukazawa S, Odaira C, Kondo H. Investigation of Accuracy and reproducibility of abutment position by intraoral scanners. J Prosthodont Res. 2017 Oct;61(4):450–9.

Malik J, Rodriguez J, Weisbloom M, Petridis H. Comparison of Accuracy Between a Conventional and Two Digital Intraoral Impression Techniques. Int J Prosthodont. 2018 Mar;31(2):107–13.

Hazeveld A, Huddleston Slater JJR, Ren Y. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Jan;145(1):108–15.

Kim JH, Kim KB, Kim WC, Kim JH, Kim HY. Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique. Korean J Orthod. 2014 Mar;44(2):69–76.

ISO-1:1994(en), Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results— Part: General principles and definitions [Internet]. [cited 2021 Aug 30]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:5725:-1:ed-1:v1:en

Treesh JC, Liacouras PC, Taft RM, Brooks DI, Raiciulescu S, Ellert DO, et al. Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Sep;120(3):382–8.

Patzelt SBM, Lamprinos C, Stampf S, Att W. The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014 Jun;145(6):542–51.

Müller P, Ender A, Joda T, Katsoulis J. Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner. Quintessence Int. 2016 Apr;47(4):343–9.

Kamimura E, Tanaka S, Takaba M, Tachi K, Baba K. In vivo evaluation of inter-operator reproducibility of digital dental and conventional impression techniques. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179188.

Kuhr F, Schmidt A, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B. A new method for assessing the accuracy of full arch impressions in patients. J Dent. 2016 Dec;55:68–74.

Keul C, Güth JF. Accuracy of full-arch digital impressions: an in vitro and in vivo comparison. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Feb;24(2):735–45.

Knechtle N, Wiedemeier D, Mehl A, Ender A. Accuracy of digital complete-arch, multi-implant scans made in the edentulous jaw with gingival movement simulation: An instudy. J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Feb 18;S0022-3913(21)00019-6.

Abdel-Azim T, Zandinejad A, Elathamna E, Lin W, Morton D. The influence of digital fabrication options on the accuracy of dental implant-based single units and complete-arch frameworks. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Dec;29(6):1281–8.

Amin S, Weber HP, Finkelman M, El Rafie K, Kudara Y, Papaspyridakos P. Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Nov;28(11):1360–7.

Zimmermann M, Koller C, Rumetsch M, Ender A, Mehl A. Precision of guided scanning procedures for full-arch digital impressions in vivo. J Orofac Orthop. 2017 Nov;78(6):466–71.

Albdour EA, Shaheen E, Vranckx M, Mangano FG, Politis C, Jacobs R. A novel in vivo method to evaluate trueness of digital impressions. BMC Oral Health. 2018 Jul 3;18(1):117.

Alikhasi M, Siadat H, Nasirpour A, Hasanzade M. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Impression versus Conventional Method: Effect of Implant Angulation and Connection Type. Int J Dent. 2018;2018:3761750.

S T, Bk M, Mt B, S H, Dt B, Cj A. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time. Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists [Internet]. 2002 Jun [cited 2021 Dec 19];11(2). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12087547/

Clancy JM, Scandrett FR, Ettinger RL. Long-term dimensional stability of three current elastomers. J Oral Rehabil. 1983 Jul;10(4):325–33.

Nedelcu RG, Persson ASK. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Dec;112(6):1461–71.

Schenk O. The new acquisition unit Cerec AC. Int J Comput Dent. 2009;12(1):41–6.

Garg AK. Cadent iTero's digital system for dental impressions: the end of trays and putty? Dent Implantol Update. 2008 Jan;19(1):1–4.

Logozzo S, Zanetti E, Franceschini G, Kilpela A, Mäkynen A. Recent advances in dental optics – Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 2014 Mar 1;54:203–221.

Patzelt SBM, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, Strub JR, Att W. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Jul;18(6):1687–94.

Ender A, Mehl A. Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent. 2013;16(1):11–21.

Passos L, Meiga S, Brigagão V, Street A. Impact of different scanning strategies on the accuracy of two current intraoral scanning systems in complete-arch impressions: an in vitro study. Int J Comput Dent. 2019;22(4):307–19.

Ender A, Zimmermann M, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. Int J Comput Dent. 2019;22(1):11–9.

Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G, Logozzo S. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health. 2017 Dec 12;17(1):149.

Flügge TV, Att W, Metzger MC, Nelson K. Precision of Dental Implant Digitization Using Intraoral Scanners. Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Jun;29(3):277–83.

Vandeweghe S, Vervack V, Dierens M, De Bruyn H. Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an instudy. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Jun;28(6):648–53.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

1.
Jalal LS, Saeed DH. Evaluating the accuracy (precision and trueness) of conventional and digital Intraoral Impression Technique. EDJ [Internet]. 2023 Jun. 30 [cited 2024 Jul. 25];6(1):50-61. Available from: https://edj.hmu.edu.krd/index.php/journal/article/view/210

Issue

Section

Original Articles