Accidental findings of maxillary sinuses in dental patients on CBCT images. A retrospective study

Authors

  • Fedil Andraws Yalda Department of Oral Diagnosis, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil/Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15218/edj.2023.15

Keywords:

CBCT, Maxillary sinus, ,Incidental pathologies, Accidental findings, Mucosal thickening

Abstract

Background and objective: Maxillary sinus pathology is a common finding on routine
CBCT scans of the maxilla. Hence the objective of this study is to define the frequency of
accidental findings within maxillary sinuses on patients’ CBCT images that are referred for
various dento-alveolar reasons in the maxilla and to evaluate the relation of the age and gender with the maxillary sinus condition.
Methods: A total of 255 sequential CBCT scans from patients aged between 15-78 years,
with a localized field of view (8.0cm x 5.0 cm) were retrospectively included in the analysis,
resulting in an evaluation of 510 maxillary sinuses. The findings were categorized as healthy
sinus, mucosal thickening, polypoid thickening and partial opacification.
Result: Out of 255 patients, 148 (58%) were males and 107 (42%) were females with a mean
age of 50.23 (SD=19.08). Implant assessment was the major request 206 (80.8%) followed
by exploration of impacted teeth 35 (13.7%). 52.2% of included cases showed sinuses with
no pathology (NP). 47.8% showed accidental findings of wich mucosal thickening (MT) was
the highest 104 (40.8%). The relationship between gender and maxillary sinus status was
statistically non-significant (p=0.346). The relation of the age (≤50 and >50) and sinus status, however, was statistically significant (p=0.035)

Conclusion: According to the present study results, the most common referral reasons for CBCT examination were for implant assessment. Mucosal thickening was the highest among the pathologic findings in the maxillary sinus. There was no significant relationship between gender and maxillary sinus status but there was a statistically significant rela[1]tionship between age and findings. CBCT can help in the early detection and evaluation of accidental pathologies within maxillary antra in asymptomatic patients. The findings of the present study recommend a thorough interpretation of the whole volume CBCT scans, by an oral radiologist, to ensure a proper diagnosis as it might have an impact on the patient’s medical status and advice the referred practitioner about the findings which may affect the treatment plan accord[1]ingly. Finally, referral of the patient to a spe[1]cialist if necessary.

References

Van Cauwenberge P, Sys L, De Belder T, Watelet JB. Anatomy and physiology of the nose and the paranasal sinuses. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am

;24:1‑17. doi: 10.1016/S0889-8561(03)00107-3.

Prasanna LC, Mamatha H. The location of maxillary sinus ostium and its clinical application. Indian J

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;62(4):335-7. doi: 10.1007/s12070-010- 0047-z.

Lawson W, Patel ZM, Lin FY. The development and pathologic processes that influence maxillary sinus

pneumatization. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2008;291(11):1554-63. doi: 10.1002/ ar.20774.

Mafee MF, Tran BH, Chapa AR. Imaging of rhinosinusitis and its complications: Plain film, CT, and

MRI. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2006;30:165-186. doi: 10.1385/CRIAI:30:3:165.

Gracco A, Incerti Parenti S, Ioele C, Alessandri Bonetti G, Stell-ini E. Prevalence of incidental

maxillary sinus findings in Italian orthodontic patients: a retrospective cone-beam computed

tomogra-phy study. Korean J Orthod. 2012;42:329-34. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2012.42.6.329.

Ata-Ali J, Diago-Vilalta JV, Melo M, Bagán L, Soldini MC, Di-Nardo C, Ata-Ali F, Mañes-Ferrer JF. What is the frequency of anatomical variations and pathological findings in maxillary sinuses

among patients subjected to maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography? A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017 Jul 1;22(4):e400-e409. doi: 10.4317/medoral.21456.

Marin, S.; Kirnbauer, B.; Rugani, P.; Payer, M.; Jakse, N. Potential risk factors for maxillary sinus

membrane perforation and treatment outcome analysis. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2019, 21,

–72. doi: 10.1111/cid.12699.

Harris, D.; Horner, K.; Gröndahl, K.; Jacobs, R.; Helmrot, E.; Benic, G.I.; Bornstein, M.M.;

Dawood, A.; Quirynen, M.E.A.O. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry

A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration at the

Medical University of Warsaw. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2011, 23, 1243–1253. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-

2012.02441.x.

Chaves, L.L.V.; Lopes Rosado, L.P.; Piccolo, S.M.; Ferreira, L.M.; Kamburoglu, K.; Junqueira, R.B.;

Aquino de Castro, M.A.; Verner, F.S. Evaluation of the Maxillary Sinus of Patients with Maxillary

Posterior Implants: A CBCT Cross-Sectional Study. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 3169. https://

doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123169

Health Protection Agency. Guidance on the safe use of dental cone beam CT (computed tomography) equipment. HPA-CRCE-010. Chilton: Health Protection Agency, 2010. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dentalcone-beam-computed-tomography-safe-usage

Andraws Yalda F, Clarkson RJ, Davies J, Rout PGJ, Sengupta A, Horner K. Does anthropomorphic model design in ex vivo studies affect diagnostic accuracy for dental root fracture using

CBCT? Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020 Oct 1;49(7):20200093. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200093.

White SC, Pharoah MJ. Principles and Interpretation. 6th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2009. Oral Radiology;p. 511.

Sanaullah, Md; Sinha, Abhishek; Srivastava, Sunita; Mishra, Anuj; Singh, Yakshi; Basu,

Shalini. Hidden Pathologies of Maxillary Sinus using CBCT Scans. Journal of Indian Academy of

Oral Medicine and Radiology 33(3):p 260-265, Jul–Sep 2021. DOI: 10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_36_21

HPA Working Party on Dental Cone Beam CT Equipment.Guidance on the safe use of dental

cone beam CT (computed tomography) equipment. HPA-CRCE-010. Health Protection Agency,

Didcot, UK. 2010; 30-1. 2010. Available from: https://assets. publishing.service.gov.uk/

government/uploads/system/uploads/ attachment_data/file/340159/HPA-CRCE010_for_website.pdf.

European Commission.Radiation protection 172. Evidence based guidelines on cone beam ct

for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2012. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/ documents/172.pdf

White SC, Scarfe WC, Schulze RKW, Lurie AG, Douglass JM, Farman AG, et al. The image gently

in dentistry campaign: promotion of responsible use of maxillofacial radiology in dentistry for children. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2014; 118: 257–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/

j.oooo.2014.06.001

Oenning AC, Jacobs R, Pauwels R, Stratis A, Hedesiu M, Salmon B, et al. Cone-Beam CT in paediatric dentistry: DIMITRA project position statement. Pediatr Radiol 2018; 48: 308–16. doi:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-4012-9

INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Radiation Protection in Dental Radiology, Safety

Reports Series No. 108, IAEA, Vienna (2022)

Raghav M, Karjodkar FR, Sontakke S, Sansare K. Prevalence of incidental maxillary sinus pathologies in dental patients on cone-beam computed tomographic images. Contemp Clin Dent. 2014

Jul;5(3):361-5. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.137949.

Salari A, Seyed Monir SE, Ostovarrad F, Samadnia AH, Naser Alavi F. The frequency of maxillarysinus pathologic findings in cone-beam computed tomography images of patients candidate

for dental implant treatment. J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent. 2021 Feb 28;13(1):2-6. doi:

34172/japid.2021.001.

Kihara, E. , Chindia, M. , Ocholla, T. and Parker, M. (2014) Clinical Significance of Pathological and

Anatomical Findings in Cone Beam CT Scans of the Maxillary Sinus. Open Journal of Stomatology, 4,

-290. doi: 10.4236/ojst.2014.46040.

Chandran A, Patil MB, Nachiappan S, Panwar PS, Nagarajappa AK, Kolte DR, Babu JS, Swarnalatha C, Nayyar AS. Accidental Pathological Findings in Asymptomatic Maxillary Sinuses in Patients

Referred for Head and Neck Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Cross-sectional Study Analysis.

J Med Signals Sens. 2022 May 12;12(2):138-144.

doi: 10.4103/jmss.jmss_96_21

Ritter L, Lutz J, Neugebauer J, Scheer M, Dreiseidler T, Zinser MJ, et al. Prevalence of

pathologic findings in the maxillary sinus in cone‑beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg

Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;111:634‑40. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.12.007.

Strindberg, J. E., Hol, C., Torgersen, G., Moystad, A., Nilsson, M., Nasstrom, K. & HellenHalme, K. (2015). Comparison of Swedish and Norwegian Use of Cone-Beam Computed

Tomography: a Questionnaire Study. Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Research, 6(4), e2. doi:

5037/jomr.2015.6402.

Hol, C., Hellén-Halme, K., Torgersen, G., Nilsson, M. & Møystad, A. (2015). How do

dentists use CBCT in dental clinics? A Norwegian nationwide survey. Acta Odontologica

Scandinavica, 73(3), 195-201. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2014.979866.

Isman, O., Yilmaz, H. H., Aktan, A. M. & Yilmaz, B. (2017). Indications for cone beam computed

tomography in children and young patients in a Turkish subpopulation. Int J Paediatr Dent. doi:

1111/ipd.12250.

Yalda, F., Holroyd, J., Islam, M. et al. Current practice in the use of cone beam computed

tomography: a survey of UK dental practices. Br Dent J 226, 115–124 (2019). https://

doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2019.49

De Vos, W., Casselman, J. & Swennen, G. R. J. (2009). Cone-beam computerized tomography

(CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: A systematic review of the literature.

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 38(6), 609-625. doi: 10.1016/

j.ijom.2009.02.028.

Manji A, Faucher J, Resnik RR, Suzuki JB. Prevalence of maxillary sinus pathology in patients considered for sinus augmentation procedures for dental implants. Implant Dent. 2013;22(4):428-35.

doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31829d1a20.

Pazera P, Bornstein MM, Pazera A, Sendi P, Katsaros C. Incidental maxillary sinus findings in

orthodontic patients: a radiographic analysis using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011 Feb;14(1):17-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01502.x.

Cha JY, Mah J, Sinclair P. Incidental findings in the maxillofacial area with 3-dimensional conebeam imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jul;132(1):7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.041.

Lim CG, Spanger M. Incidental maxillary sinus findings in patients referred for head and neck CT

angiography. Singapore Dent J. 2012 Dec;33(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.sdj.2012

Rege IC, Sousa TO, Leles CR, Mendonça EF. Occurrence of maxillary sinus abnormalities detected by cone beam CT in asymptomatic patients. BMC Oral Health. 2012 Aug 10;12:30. doi:

1186/1472-6831-12-30.

Shiki K, Tanaka T, Kito S, Wakasugi-Sato N, Matsumoto-Takeda S, Oda M, Nishimura S,

Morimoto Y. The significance of cone beam computed tomography for the visualization of anatomical variations and lesions in the maxillary sinus for patients hoping to have dental implant-supported maxillary restorations in a private dental office in Japan. Head Face Med. 2014 May 28;10:20. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-10-20.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-22

How to Cite

1.
Yalda FA. Accidental findings of maxillary sinuses in dental patients on CBCT images. A retrospective study. EDJ [Internet]. 2023 Dec. 22 [cited 2024 Mar. 5];6(2):142-50. Available from: https://edj.hmu.edu.krd/index.php/journal/article/view/232

Issue

Section

Original Articles