A Comparative Study of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Different Types of Endodontic Instruments: An in Vitro Study

Authors

  • Odet Sabah Rassam College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
  • Ihsan Nemat Bahnam College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15218/edj.2025.19

Keywords:

Cyclic Fatigue, NiTi rotary intstruments, Protaper Gold, HyFlex EDM, 2Shape, Trunatomy

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary files are routinely utilized in root canal instrumentations for their flexibility and competency. However, they are susceptible to fracture due to cyclic fatigue, particularly in curved canals. The objective of the current study is to investigate and compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of different nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary instruments. The tested instruments were Protaper Gold (PTG), HyFlex EDM (HEDM), 2Shape (TS1) and TruNatomy (TN).

Materials and Methods: A total of forty NiTi endodontic rotary instruments were split into four study groups (n = 10 each). Group 1: Protaper Gold (F2 25/.08), group 2: HyFlex EDM (25/.08), group 3: 2Shape (25/.04) and group 4: Trunatomy (26/.04). A custom-made stainless-steel block having simulated canal with 60° angle of curvature and 5 mm radius of curvature was used to test the cyclic fatigue resistance. The number of cycles required for fracture with the length of the fractured segment were calculated and the data were statistically analyzed utilizing one-way analysis of variance (p < 0.05).

Results: The results demonstrated that HyFlex EDM had the highest statistically significant mean cyclic fatigue value, followed by 2Shape, Protaper Gold and Trunatomy respectivly.

Conclusion: The alloy properties and manufacturing processes of the evaluated rotary nickel–titanium systems had a direct influence on their capability to resist cyclic fatigue. HyFlex EDM files demonstrated greater fatigue resistance compared to 2 Shape, Protaper Gold and TruNatomy.

References

Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod. 2004;30(8):559–67.

Parashos P, Messer HH. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. J Endod. 2006;32(11):1031–43.

Gambarini G, Grande NM, Plotino G, Somma F, Garala M, De Luca M, et al. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by new manufacturing methods. J Endod. 2008;34(8):1003–5.

Kumar T, Mittal S, Keshav V, Kaur R, Maakhni E. A comparative evaluation of remaining dentin thickness following biomechanical preparation of teeth using different rotary file systems: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2022;25(1):32–6.

Zupanc J, Vahdat-Pajouh N, Schäfer E. New thermomechanically treated NiTi alloys – A review. Int Endod J. 2018;51(10):1088–103.

McGuigan MB, Louca C, Duncan HF. Endodontic instrument fracture: causes and prevention. Br Dent J. 2013 Apr;214(7):341–8.

Spili P, Parashos P, Messer HH. The impact of instrument fracture on the outcome of endodontic treatment. J Endod. 2005 Dec;31(12):845–50.

Zupanc J, Vahdat-Pajouh N, Schäfer E. New thermomechanically treated NiTi alloys – a review. Int Endod J. 2018 Oct;51(10):1088–103.

Khandagale PD, Shetty PP, Makandar SD, Bapna PA, Karobari MI, Marya A, et al. Evaluation of cyclic fatigue of HyFlex EDM, Twisted Files, and ProTaper Gold manufactured with different processes: an in vitro study. Int J Dent. 2021 Jul 29;2021:1–6.

Tabassum S, Zafar K, Umer F. Nickel-titanium rotary file systems: what’s new?. European endodontic journal. 2019;4(3):111.

Pedullà E, Lo Savio F, Boninelli S, Plotino G, Grande NM, La Rosa G, et al. Torsional and Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of a New Nickel-Titanium Instrument Manufactured by Electrical Discharge Machining. Journal of Endodontics. 2016 Jan ;42(1):156–9.

Gündoğar M, Uslu G, Özyürek T, Plotino G. Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of VDW.ROTATE, TruNatomy, 2Shape, and HyFlex CM nickel-titanium rotary files at body temperature. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics. 2020;45(3).

Uslu G, Özyürek T, Gündoğar M, Yılmaz K. Cyclic fatigue resistance of 2Shape, Twisted File and EndoSequence Xpress nickel-titanium rotary files at intracanal temperature. Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects. 2018 Dec 19;12(4):283–7.

Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL Jr. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1997;23(2):77–85.

Plotino G, Grande NM, Sorci E, Malagnino VA, Somma F. A comparison of cyclic fatigue between used and new Mtwo Ni-Ti rotary instruments. Int Endod J. 2006;39(9):716–723.

Li UM, Lee BS, Shih CT, Lan WH, Lin CP. Cyclic fatigue of endodontic nickel-titanium rotary instruments: static and dynamic tests. J Endod. 2002;28(6):448–451.

Cheung GS, Darvell BW. Fatigue testing of a NiTi rotary instrument Part 1: strain-life relationship. Int Endod J. 2007;40(8):612–618.

Dederich DN, Zakariasen KL. The effects of cyclical axial motion on rotary endodontic instrument fatigue. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986;61(2):192–196.

Gavini G, Caldeira CL, Akisue E, Candeiro GT, Kawakami DA. Resistance to flexural fatigue of Reciproc R25 files under continuous rotation and reciprocating movement. J Endod. 2012;38(5):684–687.

Higuera O, Plotino G, Tocci L, Carrillo G, Gambarini G, Jaramillo DE. Cyclic fatigue resistance of 3 different nickel-titanium reciprocating instruments in artificial canals. J Endod. 2015;41(6):913–915.

Pedullà E, Lizio A, Scibilia M, Grande NM, Plotino G, Boninelli S, Rapisarda E, Lo Giudice G. Cyclic fatigue resistance of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments in interrupted rotation. Int Endod J. 2017;50:194–201.

Faus-Llácer V, Kharrat NH, Ruiz-Sánchez C, Faus-Matoses I, Zubizarreta-Macho Á, Faus-Matoses V. The effect of taper and apical diameter on the cyclic fatigue resistance of rotary endodontic files using an experimental electronic device. Appl Sci. 2021;11(2):863

Capar ID, Kaval ME, Ertas H, Sen BH. Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of 5 different rotary pathfinding instruments made of conventional nickel-titanium wire, M-wire, and controlled memory wire. J Endod. 2015;41:535–538.

Özyürek T, Gündoğar M, Uslu G, Yılmaz K, Staffoli S, Nm G, Plotino G, Polimeni A. Cyclic fatigue resistances of Hyflex EDM, WaveOne gold, Reciproc blue and 2shape NiTi rotary files in different artificial canals. Odontology. 2018;106:408–413.

Kaval ME, Capar ID, Ertaş H. Evaluation of the cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of novel nickel-titanium rotary files with various alloy properties. J Endod. 2016;42(12):1840-3.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

1.
Rassam OS, Bahnam IN. A Comparative Study of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Different Types of Endodontic Instruments: An in Vitro Study. EDJ [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 30 [cited 2025 Dec. 31];8(2):161-70. Available from: https://edj.hmu.edu.krd/index.php/journal/article/view/469

Issue

Section

Original Articles