Maxillary Rehabilitation with Pterygoid Implants: Evaluating Success and Complications in 58 Clinical Cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15218/edj.2025.26Keywords:
Pterygoid implant, unilateral, bilateral, posterior maxilla, implant successAbstract
Background and Objective: The rehabilitation of the posterior maxilla is often hindered by unfavorable bone quality, sinus pneumatization, and anatomical constraints. Pterygoid implants are a desirable alternative to traditional techniques by engaging dense pterygoid plate, thereby circumventing sinus augmentation. The objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate clinical outcomes of unilateral versus bilateral pterygoid implant placements regarding implant success and rate of complications.
Methods: This retrospective clinical study included 58 patients treated between February 2018 and August 2024. Data were retrieved from patient records and split based on the implant site placement: unilateral (posterior Maxillary one side rehabilitation) (n=29) or bilateral (full arch Maxillary rehabilitation) (n=29). All the patients underwent treatment with pterygoid implants placed with a standardized surgical procedure. Success was considered as absence of mobility, pain, infection, and lack of peri-implant radiolucency.
Results: The age range of the patients in the study is from 29 to 77 years with Mean Age of 56.8 years. All 58 cases demonstrated a 100% implant survival rate. Only one patient was with complications, while minor, non-critical complications were reported in the remaining cases. There were no statistically significant differences between the unilateral and bilateral groups in terms of complication or success rates.
Conclusion: Both unilateral and bilateral pterygoid implant placements yielded good clinical outcomes with minimal complications. It is evident from this research that both methods can be used successfully in prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophied posterior maxilla depending on the specific anatomical and clinical condition.
References
Krekmanov L. Placement of pterygoid and tilted implants for immediate loading of a posterior maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15(5):832–840.
Samad, A., Diederich, H., & Ahmed, J. (2024). A Novel Technique for the Treatment of Severely Atrophied Maxilla with Immediate Dental Implant Loading. Al-Rafidain Dental Journal, 24(1), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.33899/rdenj.2024.148155.1251
Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Reintsema H, Batenburg RH, Van Oort RP. Bone grafting of the floor of the maxillary sinus for the placement of endosseous implants. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;35(2):119–125.
Tulasne JF. Osseointegrated fixtures in the pterygoid region. In: Worthington P, Brånemark PI, editors. Advanced Osseointegration Surgery: Applications in the Maxillofacial Region. Chicago: Quintessence; 1992. p. 182–188.
Balshi TJ, Wolfinger GJ. Management of the posterior maxilla in the compromised patient: The pterygoid implant option. Implant Dent. 1997;6(2):113–118.
Eufinger H, Wehmöller M, Machtens E. Reconstruction of the pterygoid region for implant placement: anatomical study and clinical results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13(5):669–675.
Malevez C, Abarca M, Durdu F, Daelemans P. Clinical outcome of 103 consecutive zygomatic implants: a 6–48 months follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15(1):18–22.
Bidra AS, Huynh-Ba G. Implants in the pterygoid region: a systematic review of the literature. J Oral Implantol. 2011;37(5):610–618. doi:10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00094
Ragucci GM, Elnayef B, Suarez-Lopez Del Amo F, Malchiodi L, Wang HL, Hernandez-Alfaro F. The use of pterygoid implants for the rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla: A systematic review of the literature. Int J Implant Dent. 2019;5(1):43. doi:10.1186/s40729-019-0188-4
Ahlowalia MS, Farhadieh RD, Veyseller B, et al. Use of the pterygoid implant for prosthetic support in atrophic maxilla: a clinical study. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(7):e634–e638.
Samad AA. Optimizing Soft Tissue Emergence Profile Around One-Piece Dental Implants. EDJ. 2024 Dec. 6;7(2):174-8. https://doi.org/10.15218/edj.2024.19
Rodríguez X, Naval-Gías L, Guisado-Moya B, Segura-Egea JJ. Complication rate in 200 consecutive pterygoid implants: a 10-year retrospective study. J Oral Implantol. 2014;40(6):699–705.
Zarone F, Russo S, Sorrentino R. From porcelain-fused-to-metal to zirconia: clinical and experimental considerations. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):83–96.
Gheno J, Barausse C, Ippolito DR, et al. Pterygoid implants for the rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2021;48(4):435–447.
Ali, S.M. et al. (2019) ‘Single piece dental implant: A remedy for atrophic ridges: Review’, International Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 08(06), pp. 271–282. DOI: 10.4236/ijohns.2019.86025
Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Survival and complications of zygomatic implants: an updated systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74(10):1949–1964.
Ali SM, Othman KS, Samad A, Mahmud PK. Comparison between basal and conventional implants as a treatment modality in atrophied ridges. J Dental Implant Res 2019;38:48-54.http://www.jdir.org/journal/view.html?uid=411&vmd=Full&
18. Samad, A. A., Haider, A. A., & Shihab, O. I. (2016). Comparison between flapless and flap dental implant surgery: A clinical and radiographic study. Zanco Journal of Medical Sciences (Zanco J Med Sci), 20(2), 1267 _ 1271. https://doi.org/10.15218/zjms.2016.0019
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jodal M. Ahmed (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright on any article published in Erbil Dental Journal is retained by the author(s) in agreement with the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial ShareAlike License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
