Evaluation of composite resin microleakage with using  different bonding agents by micro  computed tomography

Binar Khalis Bilal; Diyar Khalid Bakr

doi:10.15218/edj.2021.03

Authors

Binar Khalis Bilal College of Dentistry, Tishk International University, Erbil, Iraq.
Diyar Khalid Bakr Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15218/edj.2021.03

Keywords:

Micro computed tomography, Bonding agents, Adhesion, Class V, Microleakage

Abstract

Background and objectives: Microleakage is the major challenge in resin-based restorations. The aim of the study was to determine the amount of the microleakage for different adhesive systems with micro computed tomography.
Material and methods: Thirty extracted human premolars have been used, by preparing standardized class V cavities. Thirty premolars divided into 3 groups of each 10 specimens. In group A; One up bond F plus, Tokuyama dentals (6th generation), group B; Palfique bond, Tokuyama dentals (7th generation), and group C; Palfique universal bond, Tokuyama dentals (8th generation) adhesive systems have been used. Palfique LX5, Tokuyama dentals composite resin used for restoration of cavities. After the specimens undergone thermocycling process (1000 cycles), immersed into the silver nitrate solution after the specimens being varnished by nail polish. Micro computed tomography scanning done for each specimen. Statistical analysis undergone by using descriptive statistic, one-way ANOVA and least significant difference (LSD) tests.
Results: Group C; Palfique universal bond (8th generation) showed the least amount of microleakage followed by group B; Palfique bond (7th generation) adhesive systems; while group A; one up bond F plus (6th generation) adhesive system showed maximum amount of microleakage. Furthermore, there was a significant difference between group A; one up bond F plus (6th generation) and group; C Palfique universal bond (8th generation) adhesive systems.
Conclusion: Newer adhesive systems have better success achievements and recommended to be used in practical bases.

References

Zavattini A, Mancini M, Higginson J, Foschi F, Pasquantonio G, Mangani F. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of microleakage of Class II composite restorations: An in vitro study. Eur J Dent 2018; 12(3): 369–74. Accessed from: https://doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_28_18.

composite restorations: An in vitro study. Eur J Dent 2018; 12(3): 369–74. Accessed from: https://doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_28_18

Somani R, Jaidka Sh, Arora S. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of newer generation dentin bonding agents: An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2016; 27(1): 86-90. [cited 2019 Nov 4]. Available from: http://www.ijdr.in/text.asp?2016/27/1/86/179837

Res 2016; 27(1): 86-90. [cited 2019 Nov 4]. Available from: http://www.ijdr.in/text.asp? 2016/27/1/86/179837.

Nair M, Paul J, Kumar S, Chakravarthy Y, Krishna V, Shivaprasad. Comparative evaluation of the bonding efficacy of sixth and seventh generation bonding agents: An In-Vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2014; 17(1): 27-30. [cited 2019 Nov 4]. Available from: http://www.jcd.org.in/text.asp?2014/17/1/27/124119.

Sezinando A. Looking for the ideal adhesive – A review. Rev Port Estomatol Med Dentária E Cir Maxilofac 2014; 55(4): 194–206. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.rpemd.2014.07.004

Rizvi S, Paul B, Mantri SP, Dube K, Agrawal A, Rana DP. Dentin Bonding Agents: An Overview. JDMS 2015; 14(11): 97-100.

Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo U, Migliau G. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2017; 8(1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001.

Yavuz I, Tumen EC, Kaya CA, Dogan MS, Gunay A, Unal M, et al. The reliability of microleakage studies using dog and bovine primary teeth instead of human primary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2013; 14 (1): 42-46.

Rengo C, Goracci C, Ametrano G, Chieffi N, Spagnuolo G, Rengo S, Ferrari M. Marginal Leakage of Class V Composite Restorations Assessed Using

Microcomputed Tomography and Scanning Electron Microscope. Oper Dent 2015; 40: 440–448. Accessed from: https://doi.org/10.2341/14-022-L

Jacker-Guhr S, Ibarra G, Oppermann LS, Lührs AK, Rahman A, Geurtsen W. Evaluation of microleakage in class V composite restorations using dye penetration and micro-CT. Clin Oral Investig 2016; 20(7); 1709–1718. Accessed from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1676-0.

Al-Habdan AA. Review of microleakage evaluation tools. J Int Oral Health 2017; 9:141-5. Accessed from: [WWW Document]. URL http://www.jioh.org/article.asp?issn=0976.

Zanatta RF, Wiegand A, Dullin C, Borges AB, Torres CRG, Rizk M. Comparison of micro-CT and conventional dye penetration for microleakage assessment after different aging conditions. Int J Adhes 2019; 89:

–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.01.008

Parsa A, Ibrahim N, Hassan B, Motroni A, van der Stelt P, Wismeijer D. Influence of cone beam CT scanning parameters on grey value measurements at an Implant site. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013; 42(3). doi:10.1259/dmfr/79884780.

Carrera CA, Lan C, Sanabria DE, Li Y, Rudney J, Aparicio C, Fok A. The Use of Micro-CT with Image Segmentation to Quantify Leakage in Dental Restorations. Dent Mater 2015; 31(4): 382-90.

Park JY, Chung JH, Lee JS, Kim HJ, Choi SH, Jung SU. Comparisons of the diagnostic accuracies of optical coherence tomography, micro-computed tomography, and histology in periodontal disease: an ex vivo study. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2017; 47(1): 30-40.

Standardization IOF. ISO/Technical specifications 11405: Dentistry - Testing of adhesion to tooth structural 2015.

Poggio C, Chiesa M, Dagna A, Colombo M, Scribante A. Microleakage in class V gingiva-shaded composite resin restorations. Ann stomatol 2012; 3(1): 19-23.

Shetty H, Hegde P, Nadarsh MH, Shetty Sh, Shetty A. Evaluation of microleakage in composited with newer bonding systems by direct technique in class V cavities: An in-vitro fluorescent dye penetration study. International research Journal of Pharmacy 2015; 6(2):161-163.

.Neves AA, Jaecques S, Van Ende A, Cardoso MV, Coutinho E, Lührs AK, et al. 3D-microleakage assessment of adhesive interfaces: Exploratory findings by μCT. Dent Mater. 2014;30:799–807.

http://www.tokuyama-dental.com/tdc/ bonding_agents/palfique_bond.html.

Tsubota, Miyazaki et al. Nihon University the 145th Meeting of the Japanese Society of Conservative Dentistry, 2016.

Katsumata, Sano et al. Kagoshima University ,Hokkaido University The 35th Annual Meeting of Japan Society for Adhesive Dentistry, 2016.

http://www.tokuyamadental.com/tdc/pdf/productsheet/PALFIQUE_UNIVERSAL_BOND_catalog.pdf.