Three dimensional analysis of dental arch form and dimensions in a sample of Kurdish students in Hawler Medical University.

Authors

  • Barzan Mahmood Department of POP, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.
  • Bayan Hassan Department of POP, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15218/edj.2023.01

Keywords:

Arch form, Dental arch width and depth, intra-oral scanner, 3D analysis, 3D software

Abstract

Background: This study aims to use 3D analysis to compare male and female upper and lower dental arch forms in untreated Kurdish medical students, find differences in shape, transversal and longitudinal diameters between genders, and provide clinicians with a representative set of the population's dental arch to provide appropriate orthodontic treatment.

Methods: The sample consisted of 3D scans by the intra-oral scanner of maxillary and mandibular dental arches deriving from 111 Kurdish medical students (Male = 51, Female = 60) in permanent dentition. the arch form was evaluated by linear values and ratios by mathematical calculation on every patient using a 3shap ortho analyzer software .paired t-test and fisher's exact Test were used to determine if the differences in measurements between maxillary, mandibular, male, and female groups were significant. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results: There were significant differences in upper and lower transversal and longitudinal diameters. Male arch widths were significantly greater than female arch widths. In addition, males had significantly larger intercanine, intermolar, and interpremolar diameters than females. The female group had significantly less dental arch depth.

Conclusions: Based on the anatomical arches differences between genders in Kurdish students, it is suggested that each patient's pretreatment arch form, width, and depth during orthodontic treatment be considered according to gender.

References

Kartheesan, T. A study of intercanine width and arch form as a predictor of rugae pattern and relative correlation between rugae pattern, lip print, and fingerprint. Sree Mookambika Institute of Dental Sciences, Kulasekharam. 2018.

Al-Khateeb, S. N. & Abu Alhaija, E. S. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample. The Angle Orthodontist, 2006.(76) 459-65.

Omar, H., Alhajrasi, M., Feldman, N. & Hassan, A. Dental arch dimensions, form and tooth size ratio among a Saudi sample. Saudi medical journal, 2018.( 39) 86.

Uysal, T., Usumez, S., Memili, B. & Sari, Z. Dental and alveolar arch widths in normal occlusion and Class III malocclusion. The Angle Orthodontist, 2005. (75) 809-13.

Gorea, R. & Sharma, M. Odontometric study of canines of Indian population for sex determination. J Indo Pac Acad Forensic Odontol, 2010. (1), 34-7.

Olmez, S. & Dogan, S. Comparison of the arch forms and dimensions in various malocclusions of the Turkish population. Open Journal of Stomatology, 2011. (1), 158

Shammout, R.A., The Effect of Various Classes of Malocclusions on the Maxillary Arch Forms and Dimensions in Jordanian Population- Juniper Publishers. Juniper Publishers-Open Access Journal Of Dentistry & Oral Health, 2019. 6(3).

Raghda Al-Shammout, Manal Abu Al Ghanam, Wasfi Almanaseer, The morphological variation of mandibular arch among different classes of malocclusions in Jordanianadolescent population: A pre orthodontic prospective study. International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences, 2020. 6(3), 376-80.

Tibana, R. H., Meira Palagi, L. & Miguel, J. A. M. Changes in dental arch measurements of young adults with normal occlusion—a longitudinal study. The Angle Orthodontist, 2004. (74), 618-23.

Khatri, J. M. & Madaan, J. B. Evaluation of arch form among patients seeking orthodontic treatment. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society2012.( 46), 325-28.

Triviño, T., Siqueira, D. F. & Scanavini, M. A. A new concept of mandibular dental arch forms with normal occlusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics2008., 133, 10. e15-10. e22.

Ling, J. Y. & Wong, R. W. Dental arch widths of Southern Chinese. The Angle Orthodontist, 2009. (79), 54-63.

Othman, S. A., Xinwei E. S., Lim S. Y., Jamaluddin, M., Mohamed, N. H., Yusof, Z. Y. M., et al. Comparison of arch form between ethnic Malays and Malaysian Aborigines in Peninsular Malaysia. The Korean journal of orthodontics, 2012. (42), 47-54.

Al-Zubair, N. M. Establishment of Yemeni dental arch form. Orthodontic Journal of Nepal, 2013. (3), 22-26.

Nojima, K, Mclaughlin, R. P., Isshiki, Y. & Sinclair, P. M. A comparative study of Caucasian and Japanese mandibular clinical arch forms. The Angle Orthodontist, 2001. (71), 195-200.

Sahoo, N. & Sonal, R. Comparison of arch forms between Indian and Bhutanese population. J. Res. Adv. Dent, 2016. (5), 75-82.

Kim, K.-Y., Bayome, M., Kim, K., Han, S. H., Kim, Y., Baek, S.-H. et al.. Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between dental and basal arch forms in normal occlusion. Korean Journal of Orthodontics, 2011. (41), 288-96.

Slaj, M., Spalj, S., Pavlin, D., Illes, D. & Slaj, M. Dental archforms in dentoalveolar Class I, II and III. The Angle Orthodontist, 2010. (80), 919-24.

Huth, J., Staley, R. N., Jacobs, R., Bigelow, H. & Jakobsen, J. Arch widths in class II-2 adults compared to adults with class II-1 and normal occlusion. The Angle Orthodontist, 2007. (77), 837-44.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

1.
Mahmood B, Hassan B. Three dimensional analysis of dental arch form and dimensions in a sample of Kurdish students in Hawler Medical University. EDJ [Internet]. 2023 Jun. 30 [cited 2024 Jul. 25];6(1):1-9. Available from: https://edj.hmu.edu.krd/index.php/journal/article/view/205

Issue

Section

Original Articles