Abrasive resistance and microhardness of self-adhesive (Surefil one) and conventional bulk fill composites: An- in vitro study.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15218/edj.2023.20Keywords:
Bulk fill, Self-adhesive, Abrasive resistance, Microhardness Composite, Surefil oneAbstract
Aims and objectives To evaluate abrasive resistance and microhardness of self-adhesive Surefil
one and conventional bulkfill composites Beautifil bulk restorative and Filtek one bulk fill restorative.
Materials and Methods: For the abrasive resistance test, thirty composite discs (4 mm hieght×8
mm width) in each group (n=10) were fabricated. GI: Beautifil bulk restorative, GII: Filtek One
Bulk fill restorative and GIII: Surefil one self-adhesive. By placing the material in a mold in a single increment then curing. A custom-made toothbrush simulator was employed for wear
testing. The samples weighted before and after the brushing to measure the weight loss. For
the microhardness test, thirty cylindrical specimens (6 mm× 8 mm) (n= 10) were fabricated to
assess the microhardness, top and bottom surfaces were tested using Vicker Hardness test. The
results were analyized with a one-way ANOVA test, the post-hoc comparisons were examined in
Tukey test.
Results: Abrasive Resistance results, Surefil one (9.52gr) and Beautifil bulk (4.16gr) showed an
increase in weight after brushing, while Filtek one bulkfill (-0.85gr) showed a decrease in
weight.Microhardness test results, Beautifil bulk showed the highest number of VH (74.83) followed by Surefil one (70.61) and Filtek one bulkfill (62.95).
Conclusion: Beautifil bulk was more resistant to abrasion in comparison to Surefil one self-adhesive and One bulk fill. The great weight loss was observed in One bulk fill. Great weight
gain was observed in Surefil one self-adhesive. Beautifil bulk showed the highest VH number
compare to Surefil one self-adhesive and One bulk fill. Filtek one bulk fill showed low resistance
and low hardness number.
References
Rathke, A., Pfefferkorn, F., McGuire, M. K.,
Heard, R. H., & Seemann, R. (2022). One-year
clinical results of restorations using a novel selfadhesive resin-based bulk-fill restorative. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1-9.
van Dijken, J. W., & Pallesen, U. (2017). Bulk‐
filled posterior resin restorations based on stress‐
decreasing resin technology: a randomized, controlled 6‐year evaluation. European Journal of
Oral Sciences, 125(4), 303-309.
Abdelrahman, M. H., Mahmoud, E. M., Ghoneim,
M. M., & Kammar, A. A. (2016). Comparative
study of microleakage and shear bond strength
between bulk fill and self adhesive flowable composite resins. Alexandria Dental Journal, 41(3),
-327.
Yazici, A. R., Kutuk, Z. B., Ergin, E., Karahan, S., &
Antonson, S. A. (2022). Six-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill and nanofill resin composite restorations. Clinical Oral Investigations, 26(1), 417-
Nakano, E. L., de Souza, A. S. C., Boaro, L. C. C.,
Catalani, L. H., Braga, R. R., & Gonçalves, F.
(2020). Polymerization stress and gap formation
of self-adhesive, bulk-fill and flowable composite
resins. Operative Dentistry, 45(6), E308-E316.
van Dijken, J. W., Pallesen, U., & Benetti, A.
(2019). A randomized controlled evaluation of
posterior resin restorations of an altered resin
modified glass-ionomer cement with claimed
bioactivity. Dental Materials, 35(2), 335-343.
Sidhu, S. K., & Nicholson, J. W. (2016). A review
of glass-ionomer cements for clinical dentistry. Journal of functional biomaterials, 7(3), 16.
Klee, J. E., Renn, C., & Elsner, O. (2020). Development of novel polymer technology for a new
class of restorative dental materials. J. Adhes.
Dent, 22, 35-45.
Strini, B. S., de Lima Marques, J. F., Pereira, R.,
Sobral-Souza, D. F., Pecorari, V. G. A., Liporoni, P.
C. S., & Aguiar, F. H. B. (2022). Comparative Evaluation of Bulk-Fill Composite Resins: Knoop Microhardness, Diametral Tensile Strength and Degree of Conversion. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry, 14, 225.
Barakat, O. A. (2020). Comparative evaluation
of wear resistance of different bulk-fill composite
and surface roughness with antagonist human
enamel and porcelain. Egyptian Dental Journal, 66(2-April (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)),
-1395.
Nayyer, M., Zahid, S., Hassan, S. H., Mian, S. A.,
Mehmood, S., Khan, H. A., ... & Khan, A. S. (2018).
Comparative abrasive wear resistance and surface analysis of dental resin-based materials. European Journal of Dentistry, 12(01), 057-
Comba, A., Scotti, N., Maravić, T., Mazzoni, A.,
Carossa, M., Breschi, L., & Cadenaro, M. (2020).
Vickers hardness and shrinkage stress evaluation
of low and high viscosity bulk-fill resin composite. Polymers, 12(7), 1477.
Catelan, A., de Araújo, L. S. N., da Silveira, B. C.
M., Kawano, Y., Ambrosano, G. M. B., Marchi, G.
M., & Aguiar, F. H. B. (2015). Impact of the distance of light curing on the degree of conversion
and microhardness of a composite resin. Acta
Odontologica Scandinavica, 73(4), 298-301.
karacolak G, Turkun LS, Boyacioglu H, Ferracane
JL (2018). Influence of increment thickness on
radiant energy and microhardness of bulk-fill
resin composites. Dent Mater J.;37(2):206–213.
Asadian, F., Shahidi, Z., & Moradi, Z. (2021).
Evaluation of Wear Properties of Four Bulk-Fill
Composites: Attrition, Erosion, and Abrasion. BioMed Research International, 2021.
Cao L, Zhao X, Gong X, Zhao S. An in vitro investigation of wear resistance and hardness of composite resins. Int J Clin Exp Med 2013 Jun;6
(6):423-430
Turssi CP, De Moraes Purquerio B, Serra MC.
Wear of dental resin composites: insights into
underlying processes and assessment methods –
a review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater
May;65(2):280-285.
Suzuki, T., Kyoizumi, H., Finger, W. J., Kanehira,
M., Endo, T., Utterodt, A., ... & Komatsu, M.
(2009). Resistance of nanofill and nanohybrid
resin composites to toothbrush abrasion with
calcium carbonate slurry. Dental materials journal, 28(6), 708-716.
Monteiro B, Spohr AM (2015). Surface roughness of composite resins after simulated toothbrushing with different dentifrices. J Int Oral
Health;7:1‑5
Shimokawa, C. A. K., Giannini, M., André, C. B.,
Sahadi, B. O., Faraoni, J. J., Palma-Dibb, R. G., ... &
Price, R. B. (2019). In vitro evaluation of surface
properties and wear resistance of conventional
and bulk-fill resin-based composites after brushing with a dentifrice. Operative dentistry, 44(6),
-647.
Kaleem, M., Khan, A. S., Rehman, I. U., & Wong,
F. S. (2015). Effect of beverages on viscoelastic
properties of resin-based dental composites. Materials, 8(6), 2863-2872.
Ferracane, J. L. (1994). Elution of leachable
components from composites. Journal of oral
rehabilitation, 21(4), 441-452.
Braga, S. R. M., Tachibana, T. Y., Garone-Netto,
N., & Sobral, M. Â. P. (2010). Abrasion resistance
of different resin composites. J Health Sci Inst, 29
(2), 85-8.
Li, E. G., Waddell, J. N., & Choi, J. J. E. (2021).
Wear Resistance of Bulk-Fill Dental Resins Cured
by Different Light-Curing
Settings. Biotribology, 28, 100197.
Bayrak, G. D., Yaman-Dosdogru, E., & SelviKuvvetli, S. (2022). The Effect of Two Different
Light-Curing Units and Curing Times on Bulk-Fill
Restorative Materials. Polymers, 14(9), 1885.
Scougall-Vilchis, R. J., Hotta, Y., Hotta, M.,
Idono, T., & Yamamoto, K. (2009). Examination
of composite resins with electron microscopy,
microhardness tester and energy dispersive Xray microanalyzer. Dental materials journal, 28
(1), 102-112.
El-Safty, S.; Akhtar, R.; Silikas, N. (2012); Watts,
D.C. Nanomechanical properties of dental resincomposites. Dent. Mater., 28, 1292–1300.
Watts, D. C. (2005). Reaction kinetics and mechanics in photo-polymerised networks. Dental
Materials, 21(1), 27-35.
Frassetto, G., , Marchesi A., Visintini, E., Diolosà, M., Turco, G., Salgarello, S., ... & Breschi, L.
(2013). Influence of ageing on self‐etch adhesives: one‐step vs. two‐step systems. European
journal of oral sciences, 121(1), 43-49.
Bucuta, S., & Ilie, N. (2014). Light transmittance
and micro-mechanical properties of bulk fill vs.
conventional resin based composites. Clinical
oral investigations, 18(8), 1991-2000.
Rueggeberg, F. A., Giannini, M., Arrais, C. A. G.,
& Price, R. B. T. (2017). Light curing in dentistry
and clinical implications: a literature review. Brazilian oral research, 31.
Pereira, R., Lima, D. A. N. L., Giorgi, M. C. C.,
Marchi, G. M., & Aguiar, F. H. B. (2019). Evaluation of bond strength, nanoleakage, and marginal adaptation of bulk-fill composites submitted to
thermomechanical aging. J Adhes Dent, 21(3),
-64.
Caldas D, Almeida J, Correr-Sobrinho L, et al
(2003). Influence of curing tip distance on resin
composite Knoop hardness number, using three
different light curing units. Operative DentistryUniversity Of Washington;28(3):315–320.
Al Azmi, M. M., Hashem, M. I., Assery, M. K., Al
Sayed, M. S., & Kumar, A. (2017). An in-vitro
evaluation of mechanical properties and surface
roughness of bulk fill vs incremental fill resin
composites. Int J Prev Clin Dent Res, 4(1), 37-42
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Maryam Fakher Ibrahim, Bahar Jafaar Selivany, Abduloma Baraka Ali (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright on any article published in Erbil Dental Journal is retained by the author(s) in agreement with the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial ShareAlike License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
