Evaluation of filling ability of Guttaflow Bioseal sealer to the simulated lateral canal by scanning electron microscope

An in vitro study

Authors

  • Hero Mohammed Zahid Conservative Department (M.Sc. Student), College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University
  • Niaz Hama Ghareeb Conservative Department, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15218/edj.2019.13

Keywords:

Lateral canal, scanning, electron microscope, Guttaflow, Bioceramic, AH Plus, Root canal treatment.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Lateral canals establish a connection between the main root canal and periodontal ligament. Any necrotic tissue and bacteria residing in the lateral canals influence the efficiency of the filling of the root canal and the outcome of root canal therapy. The aim of this study was to determine which type of root canal sealer among GuttaFlow Bioseal, AH-Plus and Endosequence BC sealer provides deeper penetration into artificially prepared lateral canals.

Methods: Thirty mandibular first premolars with single canals and mature roots were instrumented using Protaper universal rotary system after decoronation and standardisation of length (12mm). Three lateral canals were prepared in the coronal, middle and apical thirds in each root (at 3, 6, and 9 mm) using #15 engine-driven reamer. The specimens were divided into three groups (n = 10), according to the filling material, (I): Guttaflow Bioseal seal, (II): AH Plus sealer, (III): Endosequence Bioceramic sealer. In all groups, specimens were obturated using the corresponding Protaper universal gutta-percha and accessory cones. Specimens in each group were cross sectioned. Depth of sealer penetration was measured using a scanning electron microscope.

Results: The data were subjected to ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD tests, with significance level of 5%. There was no difference among the tested sealers for filling the lateral canals. Concerning the positions of lateral canals, no differences were also found among sealer types, except for middle portion (at 7 mm from the apex); statistically there is a significant difference between three types of sealer (P value= 0.05), where GuttaFlow Bioseal showed a significantly greater penetration depth than AH Plus sealer.

References

1. Patel S, Duncan HF, 2011. Pitt Ford's ProblemBased Learning in Endodontology. John Wiley & Sons: Oxford, UK.

2. Peters, OA, 2004. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. Journal of Endodontics 30(8):559-67.

3. Venturi M., Di Lenarda R, Prati C, Breschi L, 2005. An in vitro model to investigate filling of lateral canals. Journal of Endodontics 31(12), pp.877-881.

4. Fernández R, Cadavid D, Zapata SM, Álvarez LG, Restrepo FA, 2013. Impact of three radiographic methods in the outcome of nonsurgical endodontic treatment: a five-year follow-up. Journal of Endodontics 39 (9) pp.1097-1103.

5. Grossman LLI, Oliet S, Del Rio C.E, 1988. Endodontic practice. 11th Edition Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.

6. Ingle JI, Baumgartner JC, 2008. Ingle's endodontics PMPH: USA.

7. Adanir N, Cobankara FK, Belli S, 2006. Sealing properties of different resin‐based root canal sealers. In Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials, 77(1), pp.1-4.

8. Williams C, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Pashley DH, Tay FR, 2006. A comparison of cohesive strength and stiffness of Resilon and gutta-percha. Journal of Endodontics 32 (6) pp. 553-

14. Costa JA, Rached‐Júnior FA, Souza‐Gabriel AE, Silva‐Sousa YTC, Sousa‐Neto MD 2010. Push‐out strength of methacrylate resin‐based sealers to root canal walls. International Endodontic Journal 43(8), pp.698-706.

15. Owen MJ, 2000. Surface properties and applications. In Silicon-containing polymers (pp. 213-231). Springer, Dordrecht.

16. Pantaleo A, Ferri D, Roma D, Pellerano A, 2013. Structural silicone sealant modelling for wood frames: influence of adhesion on bonding strength. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology 27 (11) pp.1259-1277.

17. Akcay, M, Arslan H, Durmus N, Mese M, Capar ID, 2016. Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, iRoot SP, MTA fillapex, and guttaflow bioseal root canal sealers after different final irrigation procedures: A confocal microscopic study. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 48(1), pp.70-76.

18. Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H, Tsiridis E, 2005.Bone substitutes: an update. Injury, 36(3), pp.S20-S27.

19. De Miranda Candeiro GT, Correia FC, Duarte MAH, Ribeiro-Siqueira DC, Gavini G, 2012. Evaluation of radiopacity, pH, release of calcium ions, and flow of a bio-ceramic root canal sealer. Journal of endodontics, 38(6), pp.842-845.

20. Leonardo MR, Da Silva LAB, Almeida WA, Utrilla LS, 1999. Tissue response to an epoxy resinbased root canal sealer. Dental Traumatology 15(1) pp.28-32.555.

21. Dandakis C, Kaliva M, Lambrianidis T, Kosti E, 2005. An in vitro comparison of the sealing ability of three endodontic sealers used in canals with iatrogenic enlargement of the apical constriction. Journal of endodontics, 31(3), pp.190-

9. Nikhil V, Singh R, 2013. Confocal laser scanning microscopic investigation of ultrasonic, sonic, and rotary sealer placement techniques. Journal of Conservative Dentistry 16(4), p.294.

10. Zhou HM, Shen Y, Zheng W, Li L, Zheng YF, Haapasalo M, 2013. Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers. Journal of Endodontics 39 (10) pp. 1281-1286.

11. Venturi M, Prati C, Capelli G, Falconi M, Breschi L, 2003. Abstract. International Endodontic Journal, 36(1), pp.54-63.

12. Gandolfi MG, Siboni F, Prati C, 2016. Properties of a novel polysiloxane-guttapercha calcium silicate-bio-glass-containing root canal sealer. Dental Materials 32(5) pp e113-e126.

13. Manicardi CA, Versiani MA, Saquy PC, Pécora JD, de Sousa-Neto MD, 2011. Influence of filling materials on the bonding interface of thinwalled roots reinforced with resin and quartz fibre posts. Journal of Endodontics 37 (4) pp.531-193.

22. Pécora JD, Ribeiro RG, Guerisoli DMZ, Barbizam JVB, Marchesan MA, 2002. Influence of the spatulation of two zinc oxide-eugenol-based sealers on the obturation of lateral canals. Pesquisa Odontológica Brasileira, 16 (2) pp.127-130.

23. Filho ED, Albuquerque DS, 2010. Filling lateral canals: evaluation of different filling techniques. European Journal of Dentistry, 4(3), p.251.)

24. Melo TAFD, Nunes DP, Al-Alam FDCM, Salles AA, Soares RG, 2014. Filling analysis of artificial lateral canals after main canal obturation through three different endodontic sealers. RSBO: revista sul-brasileira de odontologia. Joinville, SC. Vol. 11 no. 4 (Oct./Dec. 2014), p. 377-382.-537.

25. Bürklein S, Schäfer E, 2012. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and fullsequence rotary instrumentation systems. Journal of endodontics, 38(6), pp.850-852.

26. Versiani MA, Carvalho‐Junior JR, Padilha MIAF, Lacey S, Pascon EA, Sousa‐Neto MD, 2006. A comparative study of physicochemical properties of AH PlusTM and EpiphanyTM root canal sealants. International Endodontic Journal 39 (6) pp.464-471.

27. Miletić I, Ribarić SP, Karlović Z, Jukić S, Bošnjak A, Anić I, 2002. Apical leakage of five root canal sealers after one year of storage. Journal of endodontics, 28(6), pp.431-432.

28. Okşan T, Aktener BO, Şen BHm Tezel H, 1993. The penetration of root canal sealers into dentinai tubules. A scanning electron microscopic study. International Endodontic Journal, 26(5), pp.301-305.

29. Moon YM, Kim HC, Bae KS, Baek SH, Shon WJ, Lee W, 2012. Effect of laser-activated irrigation of 1320-nanometer Nd: YAG laser on sealer penetration in curved root canals. Journal of endodontics, 38(4), pp.531-535.

30. Guimarães BM, Amoroso-Silva PA, Alcalde MP, Marciano MA, de Andrade, FB, Duarte MAH, 2014. Influence of ultrasonic activation of 4 root canal sealers on the filling quality. Journal of endodontics, 40(7), pp.964-968.

31. Reader CM, Himel VT, Germain LP, Hoen MM, 1993. Effect of three obturation techniques on the filling of lateral canals and the main canal In Journal of Endodontics 19 (8), pp.404-408.

32. Goldberg F, Artaza LP, De Silvio A, 2001. Effectiveness of different obturation techniques in the filling of simulated lateral canals. Journal of Endodontics 27(5) pp.362-364.

33. De Deus G, Reis C, Brandão C, Fidel S, Fidel RAS, 2007. The ability of Portland cement, MTA, and MTA Bio to prevent through-and-through fluid movement in repaired furcal perforations. Journal of endodontics, 33(11), pp.13741377.

34. Zhang K, Kim YK, Cadenaro M, Bryan TE, Sidow SJ, Loushin RJ, Ling JQ, Pashley DH, Tay, FR, 2010. Effects of different exposure times and concentrations of sodium hypochlorite/ ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on the structural integrity of mineralized dentin. Journal of endodontics, 36(1), pp.105-109.

35. Almeida JFA, Gomes BPFA, Ferraz CCR, SouzaFilho FJ, Zaia AA, 2007. Filling of artificial lateral canals and microleakage and flow of five endodontic sealers In International Endodontic Journal, 40(9) pp.692-699.

36. Leski M, Pawlicka H, 2005. A comparison of the penetration of three sealers into dentinal tubules: a SEM study. International Endodontic Journal, 38(12), p.932.

37. Dulac KA, Nielsen CJ, Tomazic TJ, Ferrillo PJJ, Hatton JF, 1999. Comparison of the obturation of lateral canals by six techniques. Journal of Endodontics 25 (5):376-80.

38. Souza MA, Cecchin D, Farina AP, Menin MLF, Ghisi AC, Barbizam JVB, 2012. In vitro evaluation of filling of lateral root canals with different filling materials by using digital radiography. Revista Odonto Ciência, 27(1), pp.64-68.

39. Amoroso‐Silva PA, Guimarães BM, Marciano MA, Duarte MAH, Cavenago BC, Ordinola‐Zapata R, De Almeida MM, De Moraes IG, 2014. Microscopic analysis of the quality of obturation and physical properties of MTA Fillapex. Microscopy research and technique, 77(12), pp.1031-1036.

40. Mamootil K, Messer HH, 2007. Penetration of dentinal tubules by endodontic sealer cements in extracted teeth and in vivo. International endodontic journal, 40(11), pp.873-881.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-06

How to Cite

1.
Zahid HM, Ghareeb NH. Evaluation of filling ability of Guttaflow Bioseal sealer to the simulated lateral canal by scanning electron microscope: An in vitro study. EDJ [Internet]. 2019 Dec. 6 [cited 2024 Dec. 13];2(2):218-2. Available from: https://edj.hmu.edu.krd/index.php/journal/article/view/65

Issue

Section

Original Articles