Accelerated Orthodontic Canine Retraction Using Minimally Invasive Orthocision

An in vivo study

Authors

  • Omar Chawshli P.O.P Department, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University
  • Zana Omer P.O.P Department, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University
  • Omed Ikram Maxillofacial Department, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical Universityaxillofacial Department, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15218/edj.2018.03

Keywords:

accelerated orthodontics, canine retraction, orthocision

Abstract

Background and objectives: The contemporary demand for an accelerated orthodontic treatment associated with the disadvantage of complicated and difficult surgical procedures and corticotomies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the more conservative orthocision technique as a way for accelerating orthodontic treatment.

Methods: Ten patients that matched the inclusion criteria were included in the study, which required orthodontic distalization of canines. The contralateral side of each patient used as a control for the experimental side with vertical incisions and decortication of bone with piezo knife both mesial and distal to the retracted canine after alignment and before starting retraction with power chain on 0.017*0.025 inch stainless steel wire. The pre- and post- treatment photographed cast superimpositions were used to quantify the canine distalization and molar anchorage loss and Muhelmans index was used for evaluating pre- and post- retraction tooth mobility in this study.

Results: Statistical analysis showed a highly significant difference between the control side and orthocision side regarding canine distalization distance and time duration and molar anchorage loss. A non-significant result revealed regarding mobility scoring between control and orthocision sides, also a highly significant difference was present between control side and experimental side regarding transverse changes.

Conclusions: Orthocision is an effective and a non-invasive way to accelerate orthodontic treatment.

References

1. Mathews DP, Kokich VG. Managing treatment for the orthodontic patient with periodontal problems. Semin Orthod. 1997; 3:21-38.
2. Pilon JJ, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Maltha JC. Magnitude of orthodontic forces and rate of bodily tooth movement: an experimental study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996; 110:16-23.
3. Liou EJ, Polley JW, Figueroa AA. Distraction osteogenesis: the effects of orthodontic tooth movement on distracted mandibular bone. J Craniofac Surg. 1998; 9:564-71.
4. Alikhani M, Raptis M, Zoldan B, et al. Effect of micro- osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013; 144:639-48.
5. Kim YS, Kim SJ, Yoon HJ, Lee PJ, Moon W, Park YG. Effect of piezopuncture on tooth movement and bone remodeling in dogs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013; 144:23-31.
6. Kim SJ, Moon SU, Kang SG, Park YG. Effects of low-level laser therapy after corticision on tooth movement and paradental remodeling. Lasers Surg Med. 2009; 41:524-33.
7. Dibart S, Surmenian J, Sebaoun JD, Montesani L. Rapid treatment of Class II malocclusion with piezocision: two case reports. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010; 30: 487-93.
8. Frost HM. The biology of fracture healing: an over- view for clinicians. Part II. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989: 294-309.
9. Frost HM. The biology of fracture healing: an overview for clinicians. Part I. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989:283-93.
10. Dixon V, Read MJ, O’Brien KD, Worthington HV, MandallNA. A randomized clinical trial to compare three methods of orthodontic space closure. J Orthod. 2002; 29:31-6.
11. Kanuru RK, Azaneen M, Narayana V, Kolasani B, Indukuri RR, Babu PF. Comparison of canine retraction by in vivo method using four brands of elastomeric power chain. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2014; 4:32-7.
12. Vercellotti T, Nevins ML, Kim DM, Nevins M, Wada K, Schenk RK, et al. Osseous response following respective therapy with piezosurgery. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005; 25:543-9.
13. Dibart S, Surmenian J, Sebaoun JD, Montesani L. Rapid treatment of Class II malocclusion with piezocision: two case reports. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010; 30:487-93.
14. Keser EI, Dibart S. Sequential piezocision: a novel approach to accelerated orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Or- thop 2013; 144:879-89.
15. Brugnami F, Caiazzo A, Dibart S. Lingual orthodontics: accelerated realignment of the “social six” with piezocision. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2013; 34:608-10.
16. Keser EI, Dibart S. Piezocision-assisted Invisalign treatment. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2011; 32:46-8:50-1.
17. Hoggan BR, Sadowsky C. The use of palatal rugae for the assessment of anteroposterior tooth movements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001; 119:482-88.
18. Almeida MA, Phillips C, Kula K, Tulloch C. Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts. Angle Orthod. 1995; 65:43-48.
19. Muhlemann HR. Tooth mobility: a review of clinical aspects and research findings. J Periodontol. 1967; 38(suppl): 686-713.
20. Zigler P, Ingervall B. A clinical study of maxillary canine retraction with a retraction spring and with sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 95:99-106.
21. Chung KR, Oh MY, Ko SJ. Corticotomy-assisted orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 2001; 35:331-8.
22. Gantes B, Rathbun E, Anholm M. Effects on the periodontium following corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics. Case reports. J Periodontol 1990; 61:234-8.
23. Frost HM. The regional acceleratory phenomenon. Orthop Clin North Am 1981; 12:725-6.
24. Iino S, Sakoda S, Ito G, Nishimori T, Ikeda T, Miyawaki S. Acceler- ation of orthodontic tooth movement by alveolar corticotomy in the dog. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131:448.e1-8.
25. Heasman P. Master dentistry: restorative dentistry, paediatric dentistry and orthodontics. 1st ed. Oxford: Churchill Livingstone; 2003.
26. Daskalogiannakis J, McLachlan KR. Canine retraction with rare earth magnets: an investigation into the validity of the constant force hypothesis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996; 109:489-95.
27. Aboul-Ela SM, El-Beialy AR, El-Sayed KM, Selim EM, El- Mangoury NH, Mostafa YA. Miniscrew implant-supported maxillary canine retraction with and without corticotomy- facilitated orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 139:252-59.
28. Leethanakul C, Kanokkulchai S, Pongpanich S, Leepong N, Charoemratrote C. Interseptal bone reduction on the rate of maxillary canine retraction. Angle Orthod. 2014; 84:839-45.
29. Sousa MV, Scanavini MA, Sannomiya EK, Velasco LG, Angelieri F. Influence of low-level laser on the speed of orthodontic movement. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011;29: 191-96.
30. Gianelly AA. Arch width after extraction and nonextraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 123: 25-8.
31. Sukurica Y, Karaman A, Gurel HG, Dolanmaz D. Rapid canine distalization through segmental alveolar distraction osteogenesis. Angle Orthod. 2007; 77:226-36.
32. Luppanapornlarp S, Johnston LE Jr. The effects of pre- molar-extraction: a long-term comparison of outcomes in “clear-cut” extraction and nonextraction Class II patients. Angle Orthod. 1993; 63:257-72.
33. Paquette DE, Beattie JR, Johnston LE Jr. A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edge- wise therapy in “borderline” Class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992; 102:1-14.
34. Johnson DK, Smith RJ. Smile esthetics after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 108:162-67.
35. Wilcko WM, Wilcko T, Bouquot JE, Ferguson DJ. Rapid orthodontics with alveolar reshaping: two case reports of decrowding. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001; 21: 9-19.
36. Anholm JM, Crites DA, Hoff R, Rathbun WE. Corticotomy- facilitated orthodontics. CDA J. 1986; 14:7-11.
37. Dorfman HS, Turvey TA. Alterations in osseous crestal height following interdental osteotomies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1979; 48:120-25.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-06

How to Cite

1.
Chawshli O, Omer Z, Ikram O. Accelerated Orthodontic Canine Retraction Using Minimally Invasive Orthocision: An in vivo study. EDJ [Internet]. 2018 Jun. 6 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];1(1):19-25. Available from: https://edj.hmu.edu.krd/index.php/journal/article/view/22

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018): EDJ

Section

Original Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The copyright on any article published in Erbil Dental Journal is retained by the author(s) in agreement with the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial ShareAlike License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).