Assessing The Prevalence of Anatomical Variations in Root Canals of Maxillary Molars and Premolars Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Erbil City: Retrospective CBCT Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15218/edj.2025.14Keywords:
Anatomical variations, second mesiobuccal canal (MB2), Second distobuccal canal (DB2), Three rooted premolars (Molarized premolars), Second palatal canal (P2), Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), Erbil cityAbstract
Background and objective: Root canal variations can be a challenge to detect and manage when performing root canal therapy, and failure to detect these variations in the root canals of the teeth will lead to unsatisfactory results of the treatment. An important tool for observing the root canal anatomy of teeth that are indicated for root canal treatment is cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). The objective of this study is to find out the rate of anatomical variations in the root canals of maxillary premolars and molars using CBCT among a Kurdish subpopulation in Erbil, Iraq.
Materials and method: Data were collected from five dental clinics and radiographic centers in Erbil City. A total of about 690 CBCT images were used for the study, after applying the exclusion criteria, 205 CBCT images were included for the study. maxillary premolars and molars were examined for the number of roots, number of canals, and presence of root canal variations.
Results: The prevalence of the second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal in maxillary first molars (MFM) was 47.8%, while in maxillary second molars (MSM), it was 18.05%. The prevalence of the second distobuccal (DB2) canal in (MFM) was 1.46%, with three recorded cases, while none of the (MSM) had a (DB2) canal. Additionally, only 2 cases (0.98%) in MSM had two palatal canals, whereas no such cases were recorded in MFM. A single case of MFM (0.49%) was recorded with two roots and canals, whereas in (MSM), 10 cases (4.88%) had two canals. In maxillary first premolars, five cases (2.44%) were reported with three roots and canals (molarized premolars). Similarly, five cases (2.44%) had a single canal, while 195 cases (95.12%) had two canals: one buccal and one palatal. In maxillary second premolars, 135 cases (65.85%) had two canals (buccal and palatal), and 70 cases (34.15%) had a single canal.
Conclusion: There is a wide range of variations among maxillary molars and premolars, which need careful diagnostic evaluation to prevent missing canals during root canal treatment.
References
Almeida JC, Candemil AP, Bertolini GR, Souza-Gabriel AE, Cruz-Filho AM, Sousa-Neto MD, et al. Cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of the root canal anatomy of the lower premolars and molars in a Brazilian subpopulation. Imaging Sci Dent. 2023;53(1):77-87.
Mashyakhy M, Hadi FA, Alhazmi HA, Alfaifi RA, Bajawi H, Alhamed SA, et al. Prevalence of Missed Canals and Their Association with Apical Periodontitis in Posterior Endodontically Treated Teeth: A СВСТ Study. Int J Dent. 2021;2021:1-6. doi: 10.1155/2021/9962429.
Talabani RM. Assessment of root canal morphology of mandibular permanent anterior teeth in an Iraqi subpopulation by cone-beam computed tomography. J Dent Sci. 2021;16(2):1182-90. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.02.010
Packyanathan JS, Antony DP. Methods of Identification of Accessory Canals - A Review. Int J Pharm Res. 2020;12(Suppl 2):184-91. DOI: 10.31838/ijpr/2020.SP2.032.
Rios-Osorio N, Quijano-Guauque S, Briñez-Rodríguez S, Velasco-Flechas G, Muñoz-Solis A, Chavez C, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography in endodontics: from the specific technical considerations of acquisition parameters and interpretation to advanced clinical applications. Restor Dent Endod. 2024;49(1):e1. doi: 10.5395/rde.2024.49.e1.
Aqeel Al-Saedi, Bahaa Al-Bakhakh, Al-Taee RG. Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography to Determine the Prevalence of the Second Mesiobuccal Canal in Maxillary First Molar Teeth in a Sample of an Iraqi Population. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020;12:505-14.
Magalhães J, Velozo C, Albuquerque D, Rodrigues B, Franklin H, Luíza M, et al. Morphological Study of Root Canals of Maxillary Molars by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. Scientific World Journal. 2022;2022:1-10.
Tzeng LT, Chang MC, Chang SF, Huang CC, Chen YJ, Jeng JH. Analysis of root canal system of maxillary first and second molars and their correlations by cone beam computed tomography. J Formos Med Assoc. 2020;119(5):968-73.
Kuşuçar AN. CBCT evaluation and treatment of maxillary second molar with two palatal roots. Turkish Endod J. 2022;7(1):43-6. Available from: https://jag.journalagent.com/tej/pdfs/TEJ_7_1_43_46.pdf
Alnaqbi A, Hajir SY, Omer GM, Shehadat A, Bayatti A, Mahmoud I. Evaluation of Variations in Root Canal Anatomy and Morphology of Permanent Maxillary Premolars among the Emirate Population using CBCT. Open Dent J. 2022;16(1):e187421062208152. Available from: https://opendentistryjournal.com/VOLUME/16/ELOCATOR/e187421062208152/FULLTEXT/
Diab H, Al-Sheeb F, Diab A, Marouf N, Obaid A, Lari M. A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Study of Root Anatomy, Canal Morphology and Bilateral Symmetry of Permanent Maxillary Premolar Teeth Among the Qatari Subpopulation. Open Dent J.2022;16(1):e187421062204260. Available from: https://opendentistryjournal.com/VOLUME/16/ELOCATOR/e187421062204260/FULLTEXT/
Manogna J, Babannavar R, Thakur S, Gupta R, TN N. Management of molarized premolar: A case series. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2024;10(1):148-52.
Lee JH, Kim KD, Lee JK, Park W, Jeong JS, Lee Y, et al. Mesiobuccal root canal anatomy of Korean maxillary first and second molars by cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;111(6):785-91.
Jing YN, Ye X, Liu DG, Zhang ZY, Ma XC. Cone-beam computed tomography was used for study of root and canal morphology of maxillary first and second molars. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2014;46:958-62.
Shetty A, Bhat R, Babu B, Hegde MN, Shetty C, Shetty P, et al. Occurrence and Morphology of MB2 Canals in Maxillary First Molars in an Indian Subpopulation: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study. J Health Allied Sci NU. 2021;12(2):101-5.
Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Ahuja R, Subbarao CV, Gutmann JL. Cone-beam computed tomography study of root and canal morphology of maxillary first and second molars in an Indian population. J Endod. 2010;36(10):1622-7.
Khademi A, Zamani Naser A, Bahreinian Z, Mehdizadeh M, Najarian M, Khazaei S. Root Morphology and Canal Configuration of First and Second Maxillary Molars in a Selected Iranian Population: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation. J Dent. 2017;12(3):288-92.
Magat G, Hakbilen S. Prevalence of second canal in the mesiobuccal root of permanent maxillary molars from a Turkish subpopulation: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Folia Morphol. 2019;78(2):351-8. doi:10.5603/FM.a2018.0092.
Ghobashy AM, Nagy MM, Bayoumi AA. Evaluation of Root and Canal Morphology of Maxillary Permanent Molars in an Egyptian Population by Cone-beam Computed Tomography. J Endod. 2017;43(7):1089-92.
Al-Fouzan KS, Ounis HF, Merdad K, Al-Hezaimi K. Incidence of canal systems in the mesio-buccal roots of maxillary first and second molars in Saudi Arabian population. Aust Endod J. 2011;39(3):98-101.
Kim Y, Lee SJ, Woo J. Morphology of Maxillary First and Second Molars Analyzed by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in a Korean Population: Variations in the Number of Roots and Canals and the Incidence of Fusion. J Endod. 2012;38(8):1063-8.
Zheng Q, Wang Y, Zhou X, Wang Q, Zheng G, Huang D. A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study of Maxillary First Permanent Molar Root and Canal Morphology in a Chinese Population. J Endod. 2010;36(9):1480-4.
João E, Nejaim Y, Silva AIV, Haiter-Neto F, Zaia AA, Cohenca N. Evaluation of Root Canal Configuration of Maxillary Molars in a Brazilian Population Using Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Imaging: An In Vivo Study. J Endod. 2014;40(2):173-6.
Watanabe S, Yabumoto S, Okiji T. Evaluation of root and root canal morphology in maxillary premolar teeth: A cone-beam computed tomography study using two classification systems in a Japanese population. J Dent Sci. 2024;19(3):1865-6.
Martins JNR, Gu Y, Marques D, Francisco H, Caramês J. Worldwide Assessment of the Root and Root Canal Characteristics of Maxillary Premolars -- A Multi-center Cone-beam Computed Tomography Cross-sectional Study With Meta-analysis. J Endod. 2024;50(1):31-54.
Martins JNR. Worldwide Assessment of the Root and Root Canal Characteristics of Maxillary Premolars — A Multi-center Cone-beam Computed Tomography Cross-sectional Study With Meta-analysis. J Endod. 2024;50(1):31-54.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ranjdar Tawfeeq Asaad, Niaz Hamaghareeb Hamasaeed (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright on any article published in Erbil Dental Journal is retained by the author(s) in agreement with the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial ShareAlike License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
